Monthly Archives: April 2012

Cannes film festival 2012 lineup: the competition’s still a man’s world

Once again, the Cannes film festival has unveiled a gorgeous list. The only
disappointments, for some, will be the fact that Paul Thomas Anderson’s The Master
and Terrence Malick’s new project were not included, reportedly because they were
not ready in time – although the idea of Malick actually having a new film completed
just one year after the last head-spinning epic is fantastically improbable: as if he had
moved up to a Roger Corman level of productivity. Some observers will be
disappointed that Stoker, by the South Korean director Park Chan-wook has not been
selected, likewise Wong Kar-wai’s The Grand Master – although the festival could
sneak in a late entry here and there.

The relative absence of women in the list of directors is, however, pretty dismal: the
competition is an all-male affair, and there are just two women film-makers in Un
Certain Regard: Sylvie Verheyde, with Confession of a Child of the Century, and
Catherine Corsini, with Three Worlds.

Continue reading Cannes film festival 2012 lineup: the competition’s still a man’s world

Cannes film festival list dominated by European arthouse auteurs

A selection of heavyweight titles from top-drawer auteurs has been unveiled for this
year’s Cannes film festival, with previous winners of the Palme d’Or, Jacques
Audiard, Michael Haneke and Ken Loach, all back in contention.

A competition lineup strong on European arthouse is leavened by the anticipated
presence on the Croisette of teenybop pinups Zac Efron and Robert Pattinson.
Pattinson, the British star of Twilight, tops the bill inDavid Cronenberg’s Cosmopolis,
tipped as one of the key titles to screen, while Efron takes the lead in Paperboy, the
new film from Lee Daniels, whose social drama Precious was a sleeper hit two years
ago.

Daniels is one of the few US directors on this year’s slate; he joins Wes Anderson,
whose 60s-set summer camp romance Moonrise Kingdom opens the festival on 16
May, and Jeff Nichols, whose Mud builds on the success of last year’s Take Shelter.

Brad Pitt stars in Killing Them Softly, a crime drama directed by New Zealander
Andrew Dominik, and another America-set title is On the Road, Walter Salles’s long-
awaited adaptation of the Jack Kerouac novel.

Continue reading Cannes film festival list dominated by European arthouse auteurs

Australian directors get Cannes invites

Two Australian directors with American films will feature in a competition line-up
full of leading art-house names at the Cannes Film Festival this year.

Andrew Dominik, who emerged in this country with Chopper before shooting The
Assassination of Jesse James By The Coward Robert Ford in the US, has been

selected with the American mobster story Killing Them Softly, which stars Brad
Pitt , Ray Liotta and Ben Mendelsohn.

The drama, set in New Orleans, follows a professional enforcer (Pitt) who
investigates a heist during a mob-protected poker game. The impressive cast also
includes Sam Rockwell, Richard Jenkins, Sam Shepard and Australian Bella
Heathcote.

John Hillcoat, who left Australia after The Proposition to makeThe Road, will also
feature in the prestigous competition with Lawless, a Prohibition-era drama that
stars Shia LaBeouf, Tom Hardy and Guy Pearce.

Fellow Australian actors Mia Wasikowska and Jason Clarke also feature in the story
of two bootlegging brothers who take their moonshine operation into the big leagues.

Their films will premiere alongside new work from such well-known art-
house directors as David Cronenberg (Cosmopolis), Ken Loach (The Angels’ Share),
Michael Haneke (Love), Abbas Kairostami (Like Someone In Love), Walter Salles
(On The Road), Jacques Audiard (Rust and Bone) and Lee Daniels (The Paperboy).

French veteran Alain Resnais who is approaching 90, will also be part of the
competition with You Haven’t Seen Anything Yet.

Wes Anderson’s Moonrise Kingdom will open the 65th festival, which runs on the
French Riviera from May 16 to 27.

Festival president Gilles Jacob and artistic director Thierry Fremaux announced the
official selection at a press conference in Paris.

An Australian short film, director Michael Spiccia’s Yardbird, about a young girl who
takes on the local bullies who torment her father, has already been announced as
the country’s first selection in competition.

The festival will also pay homage to the late French director Claude Miller, who died
earlier this month, with a special screening of his last film, Therese Desqueyroux, on
closing night.

Screening out of competition will be another film from a filmmaking veteran,
Bernardo Bertolucci’s Me And You.

The Un Certain Regard section of the festival includes films from David Cronenberg’s
son Brandon (Antiviral) and former Sydney Film Festival competition winner Xavier
Dolan (Laurence Anyways).

The Cannes selection committee saw 1779 films from 26 countries this year.
Selections for Critics Week are still to be announced.

Garry Maddox – SMH – April 19, 2012

US: DVR may be behind primetime ratings woes

The theory that growing DVR usage is to blame for the mysterious ratings malaise
gripping primetime got some new credence from a Nomura Equity Research analysis
issued Thursday.

A comparison of audience figures in the 18-49 demo drawn from live and C3 viewing
over the first quarter of 2012 versus the same period the previous year revealed a
dramatic difference. The 22% plunge registered by the Big Four in live shrinks to just
8% when the first three days of DVR usage is factored into the rating. And even that
level of decline is likely overstated largely because of the sizable dropoff this season
in TV’s most watched series, Fox’s “American Idol.”

In recent weeks, many of TV’s most popular series, from “Modern Family” to “NCIS,”
have been experiencing either series or season lows. While everything from daylight
savings time to warm weather have been cited as factors, increased DVR usage has

also been mentioned as a factor.Fox was feeling the live downturn most of all with a
46% drop in live viewing compared with the first quarter of last year due to both the
decline of “Idol” and the absence of the Super Bowl, which it aired in February 2011.
With C3 accounted for, that loss drops to 33%.

Given the Super Bowl aired this year on NBC, which is also surging with the success
of the second season of “The Voice,” NBC is up 32% once C3 is calculated–but still
down 3% on live alone. ABC and CBS demonstrated less dramatic single-digit
declines in both live and C3 over the same period.

When measured on a season-to-date basis instead of a quarterly one, the increases
remain dramatic when compared with full seasons past. Fox’s C3 numbers through
March, for instance, are 35% higher than its live ratings, followed closely behind by
ABC (34%), CBS (33%) and NBC (23%). Those totals are significantly higher than the
differentials the Big Four registered in the 2007-08 season, which were all in the low
teens.

While it’s hardly surprising that broadcast’s live numbers declined in the first quarter
considering that trend has been in motion since 2008, the discrepancy between those
numbers and C3 in the first quarter are greater than ever. “Note that broadcast’s first
quarter 17% lift in C3 ratings vs. live is the highest level of lift we have ever seen,”
wrote Nomura analyst Michael Nathanson.

In the fourth quarter of 2011, the live-C3 difference was 13%, which itself was a
sizable leap from the third quarter, then 8%. When broadcast’s decline is combined
with cable, which was down 4% in the first quarter, the overall decline of TV was
10%. But C3 shrinks cable’s loss to just 1%, and TV overall by 4%. All in all, broadcast
has a one-third share of live viewing, but a 50% share of C3 viewing.

While C3 is technically a measurement of viewing of the commercials in a program
over the three days following live, as opposed to the program itself, the ad-skipping
on DVRs is actually declining. The “skip rate” for the Big Four in the 2011-12 season
is 46%, down from 51% the previous season.

By ANDREW WALLENSTEIN – VARIETY – Thu., Apr. 19, 2012

Hollywood loses final appeal in piracy case

Downloaders be warned, the film industry suffered a blow in the High Court but
copyright holders still have means to attack pirates, says lawyer David Moore.

A damaging blow has been dealt to the giants of the film industry in the High Court
today after it decided to dismiss their copyright infringement appeal case against
internet service provider (ISP) iiNet in a landmark ruling.

The High Court’s five judges unanimously dismissed the appeal. In a summary the
court observed that iiNet “had no direct technical power” to prevent its customers
from illegally downloading pirated content using BitTorrent.

But copyright law experts say the case is not the end of the story as more ISPs could
be targeted in future and pressure will remain on internet providers to do something
about piracy on their networks.

Today, the court said iiNet’s power to prevent customers from pirating movies and
TV shows “was limited to an indirect power to terminate its contractual relationship
with its customers”.

Further, the High Court judges said that infringement notices sent by the film
industry to iiNet did not provide the ISP “with a reasonable basis for sending
warning notices to individual customers containing threats to suspend or terminate
those customers”‘.

Continue reading Hollywood loses final appeal in piracy case

Is Facebook making us lonely? No.

Is Facebook making us lonely? No, the Atlantic cover story is
wrong.

Facebook Isn’t Making Us Lonely. And Americans aren’t all that lonely, either.

For all our talk of self-reliance and rugged individualism, Americans are actually far
less likely to live alone and enjoy key forms of personal autonomy than people in
other countries

Americans devour books that say we’ve never been lonelier or more disconnected.
The Lonely Crowd, The Fall of Public Man, and The Pursuit of Loneliness rank
among the best-selling sociology texts in history. In recent years, Bowling Alone and
Alone Together won significant attention and generated widespread debate. Often,
these books lament the loss of a Golden Age when Americans had better marriages,
stronger communities, safer streets, and greater happiness. They warn that we’ve
grown dangerously isolated, and after we read them we return to our friends,
families, and colleagues to discuss why we no longer spend time together.

In this month’s Atlantic cover story, “Is Facebook Making Us Lonely?” the novelist
Stephen Marche offers an unusually extreme claim about the state of our disunion:
“[W]e suffer from unprecedented alienation,” he writes. “We have never been more
detached from one another, or lonelier. In a world consumed by ever more novel
modes of socializing, we have less and less actual society. We live in an accelerating
contradiction: The more connected we become, the lonelier we are.”

Continue reading Is Facebook making us lonely? No.

Which Film Festival is the best?

Cannes, which has announced its 2012 line-up, has some serious competition. As
Tribeca begins and ahead of Sundance London, our critics examine the big hitters
on the film festival circuit.

Sundance London runs from 26 – 29 April at the O2

It has been a quiet few months on the film festival front. The last two biggies,
Sundance and Berlin, were back in the depths of winter; but now things are suddenly
getting interesting. Tribeca, the New York trendoid-magnet, has just started, and
Cannes, the swanky Cote d’Azur schmoozathon, has reared its finely contoured head
on the horizon. The UK is even getting in on the action, with the much-anticipated
arrival next week of Sundance London, an offshoot of Robert Redford’s indie-maven
event in Park City, Utah.

Sundance London is an example of that industry buzzword “diffusion”, whereby
name events set up franchises overseas. Tribeca has been doing it since 2009 in
Qatar, co-organising the Doha film festival. It’s a byproduct of the digital
age; festivals are powerful brands, and no longer seen as single-location physical
events. Sundance is following the NFL to the UK capital; American football has been
played there, on and off, since 1991. But whether Sundance London will discover that
setting up shop in the O2 arena in Greenwich is not such a good idea remains to be
seen; even free-floating global brands need to make sure their physical dimension is
both attractive and accessible.

Be that as it may, film festivals are asserting themselves ever more strongly; the
competition between them is increasing as they jostle for supremacy. It never stays
still: some have forged ahead, some have fallen behind, as the film world itself
evolves and retrenches. You might judge them by the amount of wet-from-the-lab
premieres they get, or how many A-listers turn up to pad across the red carpet, or

how many deals get struck behind the scenes. So here, taking all that into account, is
our assessment of the ins and outs, the ups and downs, and the winners and losers of
the festival circuit.

Andrew Pulver

Sundance

Robert Redford’s indie showcase is still a mecca for credible film-makers eager for a
leg-up. Its position in the calendar (January) means that Sundance manages to both
steal a march on the likes of Berlin and SXSW … and potentially nobbles itself when
it comes to chances of Oscar success. A film must sustain 13 months of buzz if it is to
start in Park City and triumph in Hollywood.

USP Arty dramas, spiky comedies, US-centric documentaries (the category with
which Sundance has lately enjoyed the greatest ratio of Academy Award success).

Audience Bona-fide directors to watch, buyers, US-centric press and minted yanks
eager for a hol in which the apres ski is seeing films and spotting slebs.

Glamour The winter sports backdrop lends a curiously hedonistic air, but the films
themselves are often screened in fairly small town venues, such as a gymnasium.

Credibility Still riding high on a reputation built on breaking major talent such as
Kevin Smith, Robert Rodriguez, Quentin Tarantino, Steve James, Paul Thomas
Anderson, Steven Soderbergh, Darren Aronofsky and Jim Jarmusch. And, even in
middle age, still the hippest fest. But it needs to keep hitting big winners out of the
park or start branching out (cf Sundance London).

Anglophilia Tasteful but sporadic. Stephen Frears and James Marsh both had films
here this year. But it’s a long way from home, in every sense.

Friend of Oscar Passionate, but prone to tiffs. In 2010, 15 Academy nods came
from nine Sundance films. But in 2011, though two documentarynominees were
shown first in Utah, there was less love for the fiction picks (Like Crazy,
Tyrannosaur, Martha Marcy May Marlene).

Harvey or Haneke? The big fella would feel at home. But Haneke is too actually
icy for these fluffy peaks.

Catherine Shoard

Berlin

The more serious, less glamorous younger sibling of Venice, Berlinale brings the heft
of the arthouse with most of the glitz buffed off. If celebrities do arrive it is often to
promote Project Worthy (Ralph Fiennes with Coriolanus in 2011,Angelina Jolie
with In The Land of Blood and Honey this year). Perhaps the cold keeps the A-list
away?

USP High-profile documentaries (Pina, The Cave of Forgotten Dreams andMarley in
recent years).

Audience With venues spread across Berlin from its Potsdamer Platz hub, the
festival does a great job of opening up its programme to the whole city. You’ll see
queues of last-minute ticket hunters stretching back from the booths in the Arkaden
shopping centre, while information on upcoming events is splashed liberally across
the U-bahn. A truly democratic festival serving a public with a huge appetite for film.

Glamour Not much. Certainly nothing to compete with the sparkle of a celeb-
crammed Croisette on a sunny day. Berlin is a fascinating city, but far from easy on
the eye. And did we mention the weather?

Credibility High. Berlin’s competition strands are varied and wide-roving. The
talent campus, which invites young film-makers from around the world to participate
in a week’s worth of workshops hosted by that year’s big names, is an indication of
the festival’s dedication to supporting new work at grassroots level. The Shooting
Stars event, which brings together young actors from across Europe “to further
future work opportunities”is well-meaning, if a little off the pace. The UK’s
representative this year? Riz Ahmed.

Anglophilia The run of success in the early noughties for British (co-)productions
by Patrice Chéreau (Intimacy, 2001), Paul Greengrass (Bloody Sunday, 2002)
and Michael Winterbottom (In This World, 2003) has slowed recently. Brits tend to
get a decent spot on the jury though – Mike Leigh took the head’s chair this
year, Tilda Swinton was 2009’s bigwig, while Charlotte Rampling had the honour in
2006.

Friend of Oscar? Berlin’s Bears awards are often ignored in LA, but the festival
does occasionally foster an Academy hit. The last 12 months have been good thanks
to the success of Asghar Farhadi’s A Separation (best foreign language Oscar) and
Wim Wenders’ Pina, which also had its debut in Berlin, and was nominated for best
documentary.

Harvey or Haneke? Austerity, severity, humility – Berlin likes Mike.

Henry Barnes

Cannes

Cannes dominates the European festival circuit. With a massively prestigious
competition list, the Un Certain Regard sidebar and the separately programmed
Director’s Fortnight and Critics’ Week, it really can hoover up the best of
international cinema. And in the colossal rotunda at the back of the Palais building, a
gigantic, thriving market keeps the atmosphere feverish. There is a massive cop
presence on the streets to deter those who feel like nicking some bling from
begowned and tuxedo-ed types on the Croisette.

USP Cannes shrewdly balances upscale international cinema with intelligent and
vaguely auteurist Hollywood fare, finding space for blockbusters such asPirates of the
Caribbean out of competition. Also showcases sensational re-releases of classic
movies.

Audience The festival is not open to the public; everyone needs press or
professional accreditation, but tickets are made available to people who live in the
town. A vast media army rolls up every year.

Glamour Every night the red carpet is packed with the Hollywood names adored by
Cannes’ commercial sponsors – chief among them L’Oréal – French telly stars and
exotic Euro-celeb royalty whose tans seem to have been obtained on Alpha Centauri.
Until recently, the red-carpet steps were flanked by a quasi-military képi- wearing
honour guard, but this has been quietly dropped: a rare example of Cannes toning
things down. Elton John andHarvey Weinstein often host A-list parties up the coast
in Antibes.

Credibility Still very high, although things took a dip in 2003, with a dismal lineup
of films, which included Vincent Gallo’s hysterical The Brown Bunny. But the
competition films, and the eventual Palme d’Or, are widely and respectfully
discussed and generally get shown around the world.

Anglophilia Reasonable. Cannes has given its top prize to six Brits: Carol Reed,
Lindsay Anderson, Alan Bridges, Roland Joffe, Mike Leigh and Ken Loach; seven if
you count the US-born Richard Lester. It has a soft spot for its favourite UK master,
Loach, but infuriated Leigh by turning down Vera Drake in 2004. (In high dudgeon,
Leigh took it to Venice where it won the Golden Lion.)

Friend of Oscar? Not really: generally, Cannes is a cultural alternative to the
Academy. This year’s big winner The Artist was unveiled in Cannes, and the Palme
D’Or, Terrence Malick’s The Tree Of Life, did get some Oscar nominations, but the
winners tend to be strictly non-Oscar, and the Academy’s foreign film picks are not
usually influenced by Cannes.

Harvey or Haneke? To a remarkable degree, both: Harvey Weinstein is a big
Cannes presence, proclaiming his robust views on the quality of the films, and
keeping a sharp eye out for acquisitions. Michael Haneke has long been a revered
master in Cannes, and his work exemplifies the difficult, uncompromising work that
finds a berth here.

Peter Bradshaw

Venice

Not long ago, Venice vied with Cannes to be Europe’s most glamorous, buzzy film
event, but a quirk in the calendar has seen its status erode. Toronto, with its audience

of Hollywood power-players, tends to get the big autumn premieres and awards
contenders.

USP Classy international art film, new Italian cinema (in the Controcampo Italiano
section). Last year saw three big Brit hits: Shame, Wuthering Heightsand Tinker
Tailor Soldier Spy.

Audience Without a film market, most of the attendees dodging the mosquitos on
the Venice Lido are journalists. (Venice is starting a market this year, so expect a
change.) There’s a healthy attendance from ticket-buying non-delegates.

Glamour Opening night at the Palazzo del Cinema is as flash a red-carpet event as
you could find in Europe. It didn’t take much for last year’s The Ides of March to
tempt George Clooney from his Como hideaway. Stars tend to like a photocall
overlooking the water. But with few promotional events for non-festival movies,
there’s nothing like Cannes’ deluge of A-listers.

Credibility The Golden Lion is arguably as valued as the Palme d’Or, though
perhaps not as newsworthy: recent winners include Lust, Caution, The Wrestler and
Sokurov’s Faust. The career Golden Lion is also a nod of serious substance: David
Lynch, Hayao Miyazaki and John Woo have all been honoured in the last decade.

Anglophilia: Last year’s hat-trick was an exception, as Venice shares Cannes’ slight
snootiness to Brit cinema.

Friend of Oscar? Of increasingly marginal influence. Though Venice is well
positioned for the Hollywood awards season, films with Oscar aspirations tend to opt
for Toronto. Ides ended up spluttering, while Tinker Tailor … drew a blank.

Harvey or Haneke? Leans slightly towards the Harvey end of things. Though
Venice programmes a lot of unheralded art cinema, it’s not exactly a breakout zone
for any of it. Films that do best here are starry art-lite extravaganzas – perfect
Weinstein material, in fact.

Andrew Pulver

Toronto

In 1998, Variety wrote that Tiff was “second only to Cannes in terms of high-profile
pics, stars and market activity”. A decade on and Time magazine went one better,
reporting that Tiff had grown into “the most influential film festival, period”. Such
ascendancy is ascribed to its remarkable track record with Oscar tips, but it’s also
down to savvy sidebar programming, swanky new premises, increasingly squeezed
release windows that favour an autumn rather than summer debut for awards
contenders, plus an eagerness on the part of LA-types not to make a longer-haul
flight than they need to.

USP Upmarket Hollywood, with especially enthusiastic cheerleading of Canadian
film-makers (Sarah Polley and Guy Maddin premiered here in 2011). The market is
mushrooming, the punters are enthusiastic yet dignified, and the films are
guaranteed to be the ones you’ll be discussing through to next spring.

Audience The public can buy tickets in a complicatedly democratic system, but
mostly attendees are press, buyers and film-makers themselves. Outside Burbank,
this is the place to catch the movies you’ll need to see ahead of awards season.

Glamour What Toronto lacks in picture postcard backdrops it makes up for with
the sheer slew of A-listers to be snapped next to a medium-height skyscraper.

Credibility The only major gong is the audience award – it’s testimony to the
savviness of punters that this tends to be something pretty classy. That the likes of
Werner Herzog always open their movies here doesn’t hurt, either.

Anglophilia Pronounced, but skewed towards the glossy. The Deep Blue Sea was
here last year, also semi-Brit flicks Salmon Fishing in the Yemen and Anonymous.

Friend of Oscar Bezzie mates. The King’s Speech won the audience award in 2010.
The Descendants, Albert Nobbs, Moneyball and many other gong-magnets chose Tiff
to kick off their campaigns in 2011.

Catherine Shoard

Also showing: the best of the rest

Edinburgh

Sean Connery at the opening night of the Edinburgh film festival 2010.

Seems to have lost its way since an initiative to reposition it as a festival of
“discovery”, and to shift it away from the August crowds at the fringe. In doing so, it’s
lost its USP: persuading big shots to turn up in June has proved well-nigh
impossible. Still, it remains a people’s festival, full of students and local cineastes,
even if they have to trek out to the Fountain Park multiplex for screenings. These
days, Edinburgh’s best face is shown in Scottish-interest event screenings, like the
restored version of The Man Who Would Be King, or this year’s opener, Brave, from
the Pixar team. Heavyweight premieres though, are extremely thin on the ground. AP

London

As Edinburgh suffered, London gained. The strategy review that branded
Edinburgh’s festival one of “discovery”, designated London a “major international
festival”, with funding to match. Taking over two massive cinemas and building a
giant gantry in Leicester Square for the world premiere of Wes Anderson’s Fantastic
Mr Fox in 2009 was a statement of ambition, and iIts exhaustive programming of
mainstream film ensures a good celebrity quotient, and it benefits from the scramble
for Bafta votes that begins in late autumn. Studios now compel their stars to visit
London to woo support at private British academy screenings, then pop across the
road to LFF events. All this activity is in addition to London’s traditional practice of
programming as many foreign films as possible, catering for and supported by the
capital’s multiple immigrant communities. And now its principal sponsors, the BFI,
have become British cinema’s lead agency, it can only get better.AP

San Sebastian

In the Basque region of Spain, the festival supports not just Spanish (Pedro
Almodóvar had his first festival outing at San Sebastian) and Latin American but
Basque cinema too. (It has its own Zinemira. he city resembles a laid-back Rio.
Festivalgoers turning up for movies at the modernist Kursaal Palace will see surfers
pad past to the beach. There aren’t many important premieres, but discoveries are
there to be made. PB

SXSW

“Keep Austin weird” say the T-shirts, and SXSW skews towards the off-kilter, with
fanboy and genre flicks finding an especially welcome berth, while choice picks from
Sundance (from two months before) ensure indie cred. Though headlines at SXSW
are generally made in the music and interactive events that run alongside, the film
wing has ballooned in impact under artistic director Janet Pierson. Recent debuts
include Attack the Block, Kill List, Tiny Furniture and Natural Selection. But SXSW
is defined by discussion and inclusivity, panels and parties: the friendly vibe
stretched to public and talent alike, with a happy bleed between the two. CS

Telluride

Not so much the little festival that could, but the one that does while the 0.1%
watches. Tucked up in the Colorado mountains, Telluride’s clique of über-cinephiles
is drawn by its tendency to soft-launch an Oscar-grabbing goodie (eg, The King’s
Speech, The Crying Game) before the competition (Toronto, which starts a few days
later) gets a sniff. The Davos of the film calendar where unspoken rules dictate that
all new films must be US premieres and that the line-up remains a secret until the
chosen arrive.Clean air, buzz films – but the cheapest entry is $390. “The most
happening art movie town in America” (Roger Ebert) – but it makes Cannes look
democratic. HB

Tribeca

Conceived by Robert De Niro in the wake of 9/11, to draw investors back to lower
Manhattan. It has done the job – the festival has generated around $725m in local
economic activity over its 11 years – but, while local celebs are supportive and
attendance continues to climb, it can’t draw international talent. Marvel’s Avengers
Assemble, the new Morgan Spurlock’s Mansome and indie darling Daryl Wein’s Lola
Versus are premiering this year. That’s a film about protecting New York, a film
about finding love in New York and a film made in New York. Tribeca’s efforts to
jump the nest include the Doha Tribeca film festival – a collaboration between the
non-profit and the Qatari state that launched Jean-Jacques Annaud’s Black Gold in
November last year – and an online streaming service that makes festival films
available across the US. Their success could dictate how far De Niro and co can take
Manhattan. HB

The Guardian. Peter Bradshaw, Henry Barnes, Andrew Pulver, Catherine Shoard – guardian.co.uk, Thursday 19 April 2012

Net gets with the program

The rise of television via broadband is finally giving pay TV viewers a choice,
writes David Braue.

Let’s face it, when it comes to pay TV options in Australia, there hasn’t been much of
a choice: Foxtel (or Austar in regional areas). No wonder writer and 10-year Foxtel
customer Anna Spargo-Ryan was amazed to find she was paying more for pay TV
than she needed to. Like most of us, she thought she had no alternative.

That changed when she found most of the same channels she, her partner and
children liked could be watched for about $20 a month, plus the cost of a broadband
connection. She switched to FetchTV, a fast-growing pay-TV provider that delivers
the National Geographic Channel, Animal Planet, E!, MTV and free and on-demand
movies through various internet service providers (ISPs).

”We were getting frequent price increases on Foxtel and it got to the stage where it
just seemed like too much to pay for TV,” Spargo-Ryan recalls.

Increasingly, people are questioning their subscription choices as television via the
internet – known as IPTV (internet protocol TV) services – begin to push their way
into more homes via ADSL, cable, video game consoles and mobile connections.

In many cases, internet service providers are presenting them as lower-cost
alternatives with more choice than free-to-air TV. ISPs such as iiNet, Internode,
Adam Internet and Optus offer services from FetchTV to their subscribers but they

are not alone. Foxtel offers its services over IPTV to Xbox 360 users, while Telstra’s
T-Box has more than 300,000 users who access IPTV channels and Foxtel via its T-
Box. TPG Internet has offered IPTV for years – it includes 17 primarily overseas-
based channels in its broadband subscription package.

Lack of big-name licensing content agreements had kept IPTV on the fringes and
viewer reluctance to download high-quality TV over internet connections measured
by strict monthly quotas didn’t help. But download quotas and perceived quality
issues have all but disappeared. Bundled broadband and IPTV packages now offer
quota-free and quality-guaranteed services.

Telstra moved early in this space, promoting its T-Box to its massive BigPond
internet customer base with great success. It has been aided by incentives such as
early access to newHomeland episodes and extensive AFL coverage.

Thanks to mainstream support for IPTV and moves to exempt it from monthly
quotas, access prices are expected to come down and offerings expected to expand
significantly in coming years. Analysts from research firm IDC Australia believe the
market will grow rapidly, particularly on the back of the National Broadband
Network – Australia’s newest national infrastructure project – which promises faster
internet speeds.

IPTV is also becoming popular thanks to smart TVs (our story last week), with
brands such as Samsung, LG, Sony and Panasonic offering on-demand IPTV
services, although they are usually not quota-free.

FetchTV – fetchtv.com.au

Set-top box delivers quota-free channels, free-to-air channels and on-demand video
to your lounge room. Supports recording, time-shifting, iPhone app and more.

Cost: Full service about $20 a month, basic service $10 a month; must rent a set-top
box and subscribe to Adam Internet, iiNet, Internode or Optus.

Foxtel on Xbox 360 – foxtel.com.au/xbox/packages

Xbox 360 users can subscribe, then access IPTV channels such as MTV, National
Geographic, Nickelodeon, Discovery Channel and more. Unmetered for BigPond
internet customers, so if you’re with a different ISP, ensure you have an internet plan
with a large download quota (more than 100 gigabytes).

Cost: Basic service $19.50 a month; sports $10, Showtime movies, Movie Network
and Entertainment ($15 each) add-ons available.

Telstra T-Box – telstra.com.au/tv/tbox

Set-top box includes Foxtel channels, free-to-air and other content. Records, rewinds
and has an iPhone app.

Cost: Buy the box outright for $299 or pay $35 + $11/month on 24-month contract.
Add plans at $19.50 a month; sports $10 and Showtime movies, Movie Network and
Entertainment ($15 each) add-ons are available. Unmetered for BigPond internet
customers.

David Brue, SMH – April 22, 2012

Wolverine sequel to give local producers greater fangs

Hugh Jackman is returning to Australia to make The Wolverine, his sixth outing as
the Marvel character, thanks to a $12.8 million federal government subsidy.

And while billed as a “one-off”, the local film industry has its fingers crossed that the
near-doubling of the standard assistance for a big-budget foreign production is a sign
of things to come in next month’s budget.

The Wolverine is set in Japan but will be shot at Fox Studios in Sydney between July
and December. Hugh Jackman will star and produce. “It’s so great to bring these big
movies down there, to keep people working,” Jackman told the Today program from
London, where he is filming Les Miserables for Oscar-winning director Tom Hooper
(The King’s Speech). “I just have to say thanks to Prime Minister Gillard, she was
instrumental with this.”

Ms Gillard and Arts Minister Simon Crean jointly announced on Friday “a one-off
payment” that provides Marvel Entertainment, the Hollywood producers of The
Wolverine, a 30 per cent rebate through the tax system on production expenditure in
Australia. “Without this … the producers of The Wolverine would not have chosen
Australia as the location,” their statement said.

They claimed the subsidy would generate “over $80 million of investment in
Australia and create more than 2000 jobs”.

But local industry figures are hopeful the “one-off” caveat could soon be lifted.

“It’s a positive step for us, it shows the government’s willingness to look at the
proposed increase to the location offset,” said Debra Richards, chief of Ausfilm,
which is charged with attracting big-spending foreign productions to Australia.

Ausfilm and others have been lobbying the government for an increase in the foreign
location offset for the past three years as the strong Australian dollar and competing
incentive schemes offered by more than 40 states within the US and countries such
as the UK, Canada and even Malaysia combine to make Australia too expensive for
big-budget foreign productions.

The offset was introduced in 2001, at 12.5 per cent. At the time, the Australian dollar
was worth about 50 cents. In 2007 it was increased to 15 per cent as a number of
other territories copied, and often bettered, Australia’s incentives. Last year it was
increased to 16.5 per cent.

The industry is seeking an increase to 30 per cent, and is believed to have support
from both sides of politics because big-budget foreign productions are seen as
important in training and retaining technical personnel.

Crucial to the case it has taken to government is the argument that the cost to
government will be relatively low as Australia is unlikely to be inundated with big
productions. “It won’t be opening the floodgates,” said Ms Richards. “There’s a
natural capacity here in terms of personnel and facilities.”

Sources suggest that capacity might be one large production per annum in each of
Queensland (Warner studios), NSW (Fox) and Victoria (Melbourne Docklands
Studios).

Docklands boss Rod Allan greeted the news with both cautious optimism and regret.

“I think it’s terrific the federal government is willing to look at a one-off production
offset and I hope that’s an indication of its willingness to look at the offset generally,”
he said.

“I’d have preferred Wolverine to have come here, but now the Sydney studios are tied
up for the rest of the year we’re in a great position to compete for other projects.”

Asked if the decision foreshadowed an announcement on the offset scheme in the
budget, Simon Crean’s office replied “the issues facing the screen industry are
important to the government and will remain on our agenda over the coming years”.

The budget will be handed down on May 8.

Karl Quinn – SMH – April 20, 2012

Making the cut

Hype about Blue-Tongue Films as the local industry’s future raises questions about
the place of box office success.

He cites Gene Hackman as his role model and – if all goes according to plan – could
become Australia’s most unlikely leading man since Geoffrey Rush after his Oscar-
winning turn in Shine. He is Joel Edgerton: Australia’s man of the moment in
Hollywood, star of the new Aussie thriller Wish You Were Here and part of the
filmmaking collective Blue-Tongue, lauded by many as the future of the Australian
film industry after producing Animal Kingdom.

Joel Edgerton is part of the much-praised Blue-Tongue Film collective.

Briefly back in Sydney, Edgerton is all too aware of the need to maximise opportunity
while it’s there – he spent a decade breaking into Hollywood, after all – and believes
the ”clubhouse” (which is how he describes Blue-Tongue) is vital to his creative
output and that of fellow club member, actor-director Kieran Darcy-Smith.

The others are Edgerton’s filmmaker brother, Nash, writer-director Spencer Susser,
editor Luke Doolan, stuntman-actor Tony Lynch and the director of Animal Kingdom, David Michod.

Curiously wary of his legacy at age 37, Edgerton insists there’s no better way to foster
talent and maintain the momentum started by Michod’s critically acclaimed debut in
2010.

”David’s success with Animal Kingdom had a residue that rubbed off on all of us,”
Edgerton tells Unwind at the world premiere of Wish You Were Here at the
Sundance Film Festival in Utah. ”Hopefully, it’ll continue.

”We didn’t really intend it but we’re happy that [Blue-Tongue] evolved like that.
What it is is a bunch of guys who all like each other’s work. Now, whenever I write
something, I’ll hand it to the other guys and they tell me what’s wrong with it.”

Although he’s busy making back-to-back films this year – he’s currently shooting
Kathryn Bigelow’s Osama bin Laden feature in Jordan – Edgerton remains a prolific
writer.

He already has one script sold in the US – an ode to the films of John Hughes
called One-Night Stand – with three others in development: the follow-up to Animal
Kingdom, The Rover (co-written with Michod); a follow-up to The Square (co-
written with Nash); and a self-penned police thriller set in the multicultural western
suburbs of Sydney, where he grew up. All are being co-produced by Blue-Tongue.

Despite the critical buzz that follows much of their work, not everyone is convinced.
Given that last year was Australian cinema’s worst in a decade (barely 3 per cent of
the movie-going public watched a local film in 2011), critical applause is not enough.

Gary Hamilton, who heads up global sales-production house Arclight – and whose
latest hit, A Few Best Men, is enjoying a world-wide rollout (including Russia,
Vietnam and Italy, where it’s taken €2.5 million [$3.2 million] at the box office)
despite receiving mixed reviews at home – believes independent producers and their
respective collectives sound nice in theory, but can prove counterproductive in
practice.

”I’d be more interested in seeing another Strictly Ballroom, to be honest,” Hamilton
says on the phone from Beijing, following A Few Best Men’s premiere there.

”We’ve got to make international movies, films that people want to go and see. No
one’s interested in film-festival films. And having individual producers is not the way
to build an industry. As much as I liked Animal Kingdom very much – it was
wonderful – I don’t see it as a model. Australia needs to get away from the mindset
that that alone will build a filmmaking community. It won’t.”

Hamilton, whose list of successes includes 2005’s Wolf Creek and whose next
release, Aussie shark thriller Bait, precedes his multi-director project with John
Polson, Sydney Unplugged – is busily capitalising on the government’s producer
offset tax break to encourage more production back to Australia. That, he says, as
with making commercial movies, is the only way the industry can grow.

”The best thing would be to have it increased,” he says of the 40 per cent payback
option for investors. ”The high dollar puts people off – Canada and Louisiana are as
good as Australia [with tax breaks]. We’re trying to help develop a commercial movie
business for Australia. To do that, you need to lobby government and business for
film.”

Wish You Were Here may not fit that mould but the husband-and-wife team behind
it – writer-director Darcy-Smith and writer-actor Felicity Price – are adamant that,
given its generally positive reception at Sundance, such a universal story that
Australians, in particular, can relate to should resonate strongly with the cinema-
going public. Even if Animal Kingdom’s $5 million-plus local box-office haul proves
elusive.

”Animal Kingdom was something of a masterpiece,” Price says, matter-of-factly.
”That was quite an out-of-the-box success. It just doesn’t happen that often. I mean,

it got Oscar-nominated; when does that happen? You just have to accept it and move
on.”

Regardless of how well it plays out in theatres, its creative alumni are determined to
continue on their path, pointing to a potentially divided landscape in the years ahead.
What, after all, is more important: cultural awareness or commercial enterprise?

Edgerton and his teammates believe a middle ground of sorts is possible. ”I want
them to carry something more,” he says of the stories he and his Blue-Tongue
colleagues are currently developing, and of his choices as an actor. ”I mean, it has to
be a commercial thing. I’m trying not to get lured by money. The real question is: do
they resonate beyond entertainment? If so, we’re doing something right.”

Wish You Were Here is out on Wednesday.

The producers

Despite their all-male line-up, the Blue-Tongue collective has an impressive roll-call
of tough-talking female producers to thank for its successes. You could say as the
women handle the purse strings, the men go off and create.

Joel Edgerton, currently securing financing for three projects, says it’s hardly
surprising the members of Blue-Tongue have surrounded themselves with a like-
minded group of savvy women. ”Kieran [Darcy-Smith] has aligned himself with
Angie Fielder, David [Michod]’s got Liz Watts, Nash [Joel’s brother] is working with
Louise Smith,” he says. ”And the movie I’m working on here, I’m working with
Rebecca Yeldham [an Australian who’s produced films such as The Motorcycle
Diaries]. We’ve got these people filling in the parts of the industry that we’re not
really good at: robust, creative financing. We say Animal Kingdom is a Blue-Tongue
film, or a David Michod film, but really it’s a Liz Watts film, a Porchlight film. David
is part of Blue-Tongue.

”But without Liz, Animal Kingdom would never have been made.”

Ed Gibbs – SMH – April 22, 2012