Category Archives: Online Media

IndieFlix Trying to Make Filmmakers Money One App at a Time

Few independent films get seen, let alone make money. But IndieFlix is looking to
change that — one app at a time — by putting its library of titles in front of more
audiences online.

This week, that involves Microsoft’s Xbox Live, with an app on the videogame
console launching today that will offer up 1,000 films to stream. To watch the films, individuals will need both an IndieFlix and Xbox Live
membership.

More viewers means more money for filmmakers putting their pics on the service.
IndieFlix shares revenues it receives through what it calls a “Royalty Pool Minutes”
model in which filmmakers get paid for every minute watched by a subscriber.
“The sheer size of the Xbox market catapults indies into the limelight,” said
filmmaker and IndieFlix CEO and co-founder Scilla Andreen.

There are now 46 million subscribers who pay $60 a year to access video and other
content on Xbox Live. Xbox users watched and played 18 billion hours of
entertainment last year, Microsoft said, with usage of apps on the console growing
57% in 2012.That’s certainly a lot of digital coin should IndieFlix be able to entice Xbox Live’s  users to steer away from Netflix, Hulu, Amazon — and their games, of course.
The Xbox Live deal will actually make IndieFlix’s short and full-length features,
documentaries and web series available in six countries: the United States, Canada,
United Kingdom, Ireland, Australia and New Zealand. It also has a similar streaming
deal with Roku.

“We think the Xbox audience ‘gets’ independent film,” Andreen said. “We believe
they’ll love the original content and appreciate the raw creativity of these fiercely
independent artists who work outside of the ‘system’ to make the movies they want
to make – no need for permission or bowing to someone else’s editorial control.”

Marc Graser – VARIETY – 26 March 2013

Sydney Film Festival launches free online publication to celebrate anniversary

Wednesday 27 March 2013

A free online publication has been launched to celebrate the 60th anniversary of the
Sydney Film Festival.

Sydney Film Festival 1954 to Now: A Living Archive was launched by NSW minister
for the arts, George Souris.

“This new digital archive is not only a comprehensive anthology of Sydney Film
Festival and the Australian film industry, but it is also a celebration of Sydney and
NSW as the nation’s hub of film and creative industries,” the minister said.

The publication employs Realview technology and was partially funded by a special
history grant via the City of Sydney’s History Publication Sponsorship Program.
“The City of Sydney is pleased to support this wonderful archive which shows how
significant the festival’s impact has been to the evolution of the city’s cultural life
over the past 60 years,” said Lord Mayor of Sydney, Clover Moore.

Sydney Film Festival’s festival director Nashen Moodley said: “This free digital
archive provides a thorough historical overview of the festival, which has challenged,
delighted and entertained Sydneysiders for six decades.

“Within its pages you will find a multi-layered, multi-dimensional chronicle of
Sydney Film Festival – its past, present and future, seen from many perspectives and
told with many voices.

“It is an amazing resource full of multimedia, interviews and analysis of the history of
the festival, its relationship to the local and international film industries, its position
in cinema history and its role in the development of local art, culture and
entertainment.”

The publication can be viewed here:
http://online.sffarchive.org.au/#folio=1

Warning to Hollywood: Chinese Hackers Want Your Secrets

A top cybersecurity lawyer says the Chinese are after any edge they can get, from
financial details that help with negotiations to reading scripts.

3/7/2013 by Stewart Baker, who practices cybersecurity law at Steptoe & Johnson in
Washington. He has been a top official concerned with cybersecurity policy at the
Department of Homeland Security and the National Security Agency – THR

Hollywood should be on notice: It’s not just the Pentagon and CIA that are victims of
hackers. They’re targeting more and more private companies. A recent report from

American cybersecurity firm Mandiant linked the Chinese government’s People’s
Liberation Army to massive, sustained intrusions into corporate networks.

The report, which traced many attacks to the PLA’s Shanghai-based Unit 61398, was
devoured in Washington and Silicon Valley. But Hollywood mostly has shrugged off
Chinese cyberspying as someone else’s problem. Continue reading Warning to Hollywood: Chinese Hackers Want Your Secrets

Hollywood Targeted by Chinese Hackers

At least one Burbank studio has been hacked, experts say, and piracy is rampant in
“a culture of copying.”

6:00 AM PST 3/7/2013 by Tim Appelo – THR

Have Chinese hackers invaded Hollywood’s computers, as they have the systems of
Facebook, Apple, The New York Times and more than 100 other major Western
entities? While some studio sources say no, cybersecurity experts tell THR another
story.

“Yes, absolutely,” says cyber-espionage expert Dmitri Alperovitch, former vp threat
research at McAfee and co-founder of CrowdStrike. “I know of major Hollywood
studios that have worked on distribution rights and other negotiations with Chinese
companies and have been hacked before those negotiations had been completed
because the Chinese wanted their negotiation playbook. The other side knows exactly
what they’re planning to do and will cheat and get their way in the negotiation.” Continue reading Hollywood Targeted by Chinese Hackers

Why Netflix’s ‘House of Cards’ Is the Future of TV

CANNES – If its pitchmen are to be believed, House of Cards, the first drama series
commissioned by VOD service Netflix, is the future of TV.

Kevin Spacey and Robin Wright, who star in the modern-day political drama, flew
into Cannes to hype the series, which Media Rights Capital is producing and Sony
Pictures Television is selling worldwide. Sony screened the first two episodes
of House of Cards to international buyers. Netflix will put all 13 episodes of the first
season online at once in February.

With a budget north of $100 million for the two, 13-episode seasons commissioned
by Netflix and with David Fincher on board as an executive producer – and director
of the first two episodes – House of Cards has the potential to either be a game
changer for the VOD business or a costly mistake for Netflix and its partners. The series is based on a BBC show of the same name from the 1990s which starred Ian
Richardson as an ambitious and ruthless British politician.

Continue reading Why Netflix’s ‘House of Cards’ Is the Future of TV

Local filmmakers catch onto crowdfunding

Financing films using crowd funding is growing in Australia. It is hard to get
money for a feature if you have not yet made one.

Last week about 100 people gathered in a small studio in inner city Sydney to listen
to Andrew Masterson read excerpts from his novel The Second Coming. Director
David Barker and producer Angie Fielder also talked during the evening about how
they intended to make the 2001 Ned Kelly Crime Fiction Award winner into a film
noir murder mystery, and introduced actress Sarah Snook, who is set to be the film’s
femme fatale.

The Second Coming is about a man who believes he is Jesus and has to clear his
name after he becomes the prime suspect in a murder. It is hoped that the film
version will go into production in 2013.

Continue reading Local filmmakers catch onto crowdfunding

The ABC and Australia’s new media landscape

By the Hon James Spigelman AC QC, Chairman of the ABC – Address to Ripe@2012
Conference

THE digital revolution has undermined the business model of much traditional
media. Its effects are exemplified in recent dramatic announcements by Australia’s
two largest print media groups.

Broadcasters and pay-TV also face an uncertain future.

In such a context, we are now seeing more frequent expressions of anxiety about
public broadcasters competing with commercial interests. There is nothing new
about this. Public broadcasters have always had an adverse impact on such interests.

In 1933, when the ABC began an independent news service, the chief executive of one
of our major media groups was so concerned with the impact such a service could
have on his company’s print and commercial radio operations he called for a
reduction in the ABC’s revenue. That was Keith Murdoch, Rupert’s father. Some
things change very little over the decades.

It is perfectly understandable that commercial broadcasters and, in a converged
world, other media, should suggest the ABC refrain from providing services that are,
or might be, provided on a commercial basis. The first thing to say about such
arguments is that there has never been a time when the ABC was simply a market-
failure broadcaster, obliged to fill gaps in the commercial offering.

The ABC’s obligations are, and have always been, defined positively, not negatively.
Under current legislation, the ABC is directed to provide “comprehensive
broadcasting services” and to accept a “responsibility … to provide a balance between
broadcasting programs of wide appeal and specialised broadcasting programs”.
Unquestionably, a public broadcaster must program for minority audiences in a way
that commercial free-to-air broadcasters would never do.

Perhaps no better example exists than the ABC’s coverage of the Paralympics, with
which, it appears, advertisers would prefer to avoid any association – despite the
triumph of the human spirit that is continually on display.

However, the ABC must offer services to the community as a whole. One of the ABC’s
key roles is to ensure that all Australians have access to quality media services,
perhaps particularly reliable news and information about international, national,
regional and local matters.

We are seeing only the beginning of the impact of technological change on media.
New business models are being tried. While there are some confident assertions
about the prospects for these models, the truth is that no one knows where this is
going.

In such a context, the capacity of public broadcasters to ensure all Australians receive
a quality service with a breadth of content on all major platforms has become more
important than ever.

There is no public debate in Australia that seriously questions the continuation of
the ABC’s traditional services. There is, however, some limited commentary about its
expansion into online and mobile platform delivery. Computers, smartphones and
tablets are now so ubiquitous that delivery of a program, or cognate material, to such
devices is a form of broadcasting, in the natural meaning of the term. These
platforms are so available that they are becoming the same as traditional radio or
television sets.

Any suggestion that such delivery should be restricted because it is new is as dubious
as an argument would have been that radio programs should not be delivered to
transistor radios because they did not exist when radio broadcasting began.

That is not to say that the ABC’s determination to interact with its audiences in the
manner they prefer does not have adverse commercial consequences on existing or
potential service providers. It has always had such effects: whether use of public
funds constitutes competition that could be regarded as unfair is a matter on which
people can differ.

However, broadcasting encompasses delivery of programs to all platforms capable of
receiving them. This is how the ABC’s audiences see it and the ABC continues each
day to meet that public expectation.

One issue that has arisen in the present Australian debate is whether the public
broadcasters should be subject to exactly the same regime as that applicable to
commercial broadcasters. This has never been the case. Our entire 80-year history
has been based on ensuring that the ABC cannot be subject to pressure from its sole
shareholder.

One of the key recommendations of the Convergence Review is the establishment of
a new industry-led regulator to oversee journalistic standards on all platforms. The
review recommends that the ABC and SBS would not be subject to this new
regulator. This recommendation rejects the proposal of the prior report of the
Finkelstein inquiry for a statutory regulator. It was disappointing that this prior
inquiry, on which the Convergence Review was asked to report, had recommended
the ABC should be subject to the media standards regulator which that inquiry
proposed. This is particularly so because, when the earlier inquiry had sought the
assistance of the ABC, it expressly stated in writing that it was not investigating the
standards or behaviour of the ABC.

The rejection by the Convergence Review of the earlier proposal is consistent with a
similar rejection by the Australian Law Reform Commission. Any appeal to a so-
called “level playing field” with respect to media regulation, by subjecting the ABC to
the same regulation as is applicable to commercial broadcasters, is fundamentally
misconceived. The government response to these two reports is still awaited.

Sydney, September 5, 2012 – http://about.abc.net.au/speeches

Full text of the speech here:

The ABC and Australia’s new media landscape

Can Indie Film Achieve a Network Effect?

In a recent post entitled Networks And The Enterprise, Fred Wilson explains how his firm Union Square Ventures invests in networks. He included this line.

My uber goal of writing this post is to explain that the wired and mobile internet is a global network and it powers all sorts of smaller networks to get built on top of it.

These networks connect people with each other. Each network gains value as more users join and as each user contributes value to the network which in turn becomes available to every other user. As he points out with respect to one of their investments,

Every time a new participant in the ecosystem joins the Return Path data network, their systems and tools get smarter, making the service more valuable for everyone.

That’s a classic network effect and it is very powerful.

Achieving a network effect is the holy grail within the world of technology. The
network grows in size, power and value. Kickstarter, one of the companies funded by Union Square Ventures, is approaching this holy grail.

James Cooper has just published an ebook entitled Kickstarter for Filmmakers:
Prepare and Execute Your Next Crowd Funding Campaign:

www.kickstarterforfilmmakers.com

Every filmmaker who has thought even briefly about using Kickstarter or other
crowd funding platforms to raise money for a film should spend the $1.99 and read it immediately.

Cooper provides an overview of the state of crowd funding for film and then uses the crowd funding campaign from his own short film Elijah the Prophet to provide examples of what worked. He also takes the reader through the various stages of a crowd funding campaign and highlights keys to success.

What I find most remarkable is the level of detail he provides on his own campaign. He tells us which team member brought in how many dollars through their efforts and the number of people who contributed that no one on the team knew and how much these strangers contributed. In other words, he provides complete transparency into what his team did and how they did it.

It is worth noting that Cooper has done something that is really quite unusual within the film industry.

He actually provides real numbers. There are no approximations and no spin. He simply says here is the data and here are my conclusions from that data. And by doing so, he provides real value to all independent filmmakers.

Now I ask you to imagine, what if there was really a network of independent
filmmakers who did exactly what Cooper did and then did it repeatedly over all their projects?

I mean the kind of network that Fred Wilson suggests in his blog post. One where every participant provides knowledge to the network that every other participant can access.

This is a model from the technology world that needs to borrowed by the indie film world and used to transform the way indie film is created, financed, distributed and marketed. I would also argue further that it even needs to transform the way indie film is discussed.

Primarily indie film is viewed as if it is a disparate group of individuals who battle all odds and surmount great obstacles to finally get a shot at the brass ring. Each filmmaker is seen as the lone auteur who has climbed the mountain. At festivals each spin their tale of triumph as they court audiences. It makes for great copy (and is often true) but does it help move independent film forward? I am not sure. To me, it is not sufficient. Something more needs to be done.

Independent film needs a new metaphor.

Instead of a group of disparate individuals, indie film has to be seen as a network. One which is powered by the wired and mobile Internet. A network with participants who add value for each other participant. To paraphrase Fred Wilson, each participant in the ecosystem needs to help the services get smarter and therefore make it more valuable for everyone who is part of the ecosystem.

This requires transparency and the sharing of real details–by everyone.

James Cooper has created a model of how to begin. Others need to follow his example.

Then indie film might begin to achieve a very powerful network effect.

And every independent filmmaker will benefit.

About Chris Dorr: I consult with media and consumer electronic companies on digital media strategy and business development. Clients include Samsung, MTV Networks, Tribeca Film Festival, Shaw Media, Accedo Broadband, Beyond Oblivion and A3 Media Networks. I created the Future of Film blog for Tribeca. I have worked in the movie business for Disney Studios, Universal Pictures, Scott Free and in the digital media business for Intertainer, Sony and Nokia. Contact me at chris@digitaldorr.com or follow me at @chrisdorr

Posted on August 30, 2012 by Chris Dorr on his blog www.digitaldorr.com

Cannes market adjusts as indie pic trends shift

As the film world readies for the Riviera, Jerome Paillard, Cannes Market exec
director, sees reason for optimism. “With a growing attendance in Cannes this year
we’re seeing some signs of health and dynamism,” he says, noting that overall it’s still
a tough market where finding a distributor has gotten more complicated. He also
notes that it’s difficult getting films into theaters. “It’s not easy for films that aren’t
mainstream, crossover features to get released theatrically and stay in theaters long
enough to find an audience. Distributors, for the most part, have become risk-averse
and have restricted their minimum guarantees.”

Paillard addresses other shifting trends in the market.

VOD

“TV and video sales are tough to clinch, and while VOD is growing, it hasn’t yet
replaced video. On the upside, VOD negotiations are usually non-exclusive, but they
don’t give minimum guarantees whereas video did.

“In countries like China, the expansion of the VOD market represents a great
opportunity for foreign cinema: Films can now access the Chinese market directly
through VOD. Even if the prices paid remain small it’s encouraging.”

Digitization of screens

“We have yet to see if the digitization of theaters will benefit smaller films — there is a
risk that it will make it easier for exhibitors to program films that work well in
multiple screens.”

New distribution models

“For certain movies that have a limited theatrical potential, the traditional film
distribution chain is way too long. We’re seeing a growing interest for non-

commercial circuits, such as festivals, cinematheques and film societies. Some
companies like the Festival Agency in France are now specializing in these types of
sub-distribution, by helping filmmakers and right-holders get their movies on the
festival circuit and collect fees.”

Digital models

“There are too many films that don’t travel outside their country of production, co-
production and sometimes France (where there are about 350 foreign films that
come out every year and about half of them sell less than 15,000 admissions).

“Using digital technology, filmmakers can have their films seen and create mini-
events at a lesser cost — publishing expenses are very small and the cost of
advertising, taking into account the weight of social networks, is also very low. These
films can build an online community, access distribution via viral marketing and
social networks and ultimately get programmed in theaters through on-demand
screenings.”

Reality bites

“Documentaries now represent more than 14% of the completed films at the market,”
Paillard says. “One of the reasons behind the popularity of documentaries is that that
they can be promoted via social networks: each documentary can address its own
community in a way that a fiction film seldom can.”

Market innovations

The doc corner: A dedicated space at the market, it boasts a screening room focused
on feature-length documentaries and a meeting area for sales agents and buyers who
are exclusively seeking docs.

After the market, the docs will be available to buyers and sales agents on
Cinando.com’s Screening Room, where films can be downloaded. Site is run by the
market. The Doc Corner will also host about 10 mini-conferences for a group of 20
documentary producers and filmmakers. Each panel will feature leading figures of
the documentary world, from festivals toppers to doc commissioners and sales
agents.

Producers’ Workshop: The Producers’ Workshop is growing in its second edition.
It will address some 250 producers who have experience making local films but have
not yet been involved in international co-productions. There will be six conferences
discussing how to approach sales agents, how to co-produce with international
partners, what funds are available in Europe and elsewhere. There will also be a la
carte coaching sessions for producers.

“We’re telling producers, especially those from Asian or Latin American regions
where international co-production is still uncommon, that it’s crucial for them to not

wait to have a film in selection to come to Cannes, as they must build an
international network even if they won’t activate it right away,” Paillard says.

3D: The market has 17 3D-equipped screens (three more than last year) and some 50
screenings in 3D, which is about the same as last year, had been confirmed as of
April 15.

“Sales agents and distributors are finding that 3D movies, apart from animated
features, aren’t attractive enough to justify their bigger asking prices,” Paillard says.

New Partnership: The Cannes Market has signed a deal with Europa Cinema, a
network of European independent theaters, to allow distributors and producers of
films available on Cinando to connect directly with exhibitors.

Participation: The biggest growth in participation at the market comes from
producers. “I think that underscores the importance of co-production in this market,
as well as the fact that Cannes offers the best platform for co-production,” Paillard
says.

The market had registered 8,480 participants as of April 23, a 9% increase on 2011.

“The rise in participation is well spread geographically, with the biggest spikes
coming from Asia and Latin America,” Paillard says. “Another encouraging sign this
year is the fact that companies will send slightly larger teams to Cannes.”

More than 250 producers will attend the Producers Workshop — 40% more than last
year.

As many as 3,300 market titles, including 1,800 completed films, are set for the
market as of April 23. Documentaries rep 12% of all titles.

By ELSA KESLASSY Mon., May. 7, 2012. Cannes Preview 2012

Europeans take small steps in VOD market

Video on demand remains in arrested development outside the U.S., to the
frustration of many foreign distribs who are pinning their hopes on digital sales to
replace their crumbling DVD revenues.

According to Richard Broughton, head of broadband for IHS Screen Digest, the
American VOD market for feature films topped $1.8 billion in 2011, whereas Western
Europe delivered just $900 million.

The entrenched power of European exhibitors remains a big obstacle to contract the
windows and moving toward a day-and-date VOD and theatrical model. In France,
there’s even a law against it. Euro distribs are frustrated that they can’t develop their
VOD revenues to replace their disappearing DVD income.

Sales companies say they aren’t yet seeing any significant revenues from VOD from
any territory outside North America, apart from the U.K.

But the launch of the Curzon on Demand platform in the U.K., offering VOD day-
and-date with theatrical releases, is a small but significant sign that new digital
distribution models are finally starting to reach Europe, following the example set by
the likes of Magnolia and IFC in the U.S.

“It’s a paradigm shift in the business,” argues Philip Knatchbull, chief exec of Curzon
Artificial Eye, the U.K.’s leading arthouse exhibitor and distributor. “This is now
where the market opportunity lies for independent cinema.”

The rest of Europe is watching this arthouse experiment with curiosity, and a degree
of skepticism. Benelux specialty distrib Cineart is a proactive VOD player, but has
decided against launching its own platform, for now at least.

“We did the analysis to see if it makes sense,” says Cineart chairman and co-
managing director Marc Smit. “But in a territory like Benelux, it’s hard to make it
work financially. The trouble with a distributor-led platform is having enough films
on it. People want choice, and you can’t rely only on your own taste.”

The Brit VOD market is already far in advance of the rest of Europe, with fierce
competition between subscription VOD players Lovefilm and Netflix to sign up indie
distribs and major studios with lucrative output deals. Those deals, with the likes of
Studiocanal, eOne, Momentum and Lionsgate, have revolutionized the economics of
U.K. indie distribution over the past 12 months.

Meanwhile, pay TV giant BskyB is also making an aggressive move into the VOD
market with its own Internet movie service to supplement the pay-per-view outlet on
its own satellite platform.

“The U.K. is very evolved, but continental Europe not as advanced,” agrees Exclusive
chief operating officer Marc Schipper. “The main reason is that the key European
players are the broadcasters and telecom companies, and they aren’t as
entrepreneurial.”

Knatchbull is convinced there’s also room for an arthouse player with a strong brand
and a distinctive programming policy to carve out a niche among the big boys,
particularly when its virtual service is closely tied to physical cinemas.

“If you’re only on the Internet, it’s quite soulless, but what’s great about having our
physical cinemas is that you are more connected to your community.” Knatchbull is
such a believer in the importance of combining the two that he says he’s eyeing deals
to take over the running of arthouse theaters in Berlin and New York as a prelude to
international expansion of his online service.

Cineart, which releases pics such as “The Artist,” “Drive” and “Carnage” across
Benelux, prefers to stick with the traditional theatrical window, and then market its

titles on as many VOD services as possible. “But the real money comes from the
telcos and the cable operators, not the Internet-based platforms,” Smit says.

He says the VOD market is more developed in Belgium, thanks to the investment of
telco Belgacom, than in the Netherlands. Overall, Cineart’s VOD income is growing
by 50% a year, from 2%-3% of sales three years ago to 8%-10% today. Aside from the
top theatrical titles, its best performers are pics with a thriller twist, such as
“Essential Killing” or “13 Assassins,” or arty pics with a misleadingly sexy titles.

Sales agents say that VOD is becoming a more noteworthy factor in negotiations with
Euro distribs, even if the revenues are not yet significant. “We’re all paying a lot more
attention to VOD in deal terms, but it’s not coming through significantly in the
reporting yet, except in the U.K. where we’re beginning to see impact on the bottom
line from Netflix and Lovefilm,” says Focus Features Intl. prexy Alison Thompson.

VOD deals are negotiated on either a royalty or a fee basis, which varies from
territory to territory. The distributor’s share is typically lower than on DVD — maybe
40%-50%, rather than 60%-85% — because the VOD entails much lower physical
costs for the distrib. “Historically the DVD splits were terrible for producers, so this
is a chance to roll those back,” says one top sales agent.

“The U.K. is the strongest foreign market for VOD. We’re seeing some value in
Australia and other parts of the world, but nothing that’s really moving the dial,” says
Alex Walton, sales prexy at Exclusive Media Group.

Broughton suggests the slow development of VOD in Europe may have more to do
with the relatively primitive infrastucture of cable and telco systems. Once they are
upgraded, the potential for VOD will increase significantly.

Many distribs are waiting to see if the likes of Netflix, Amazon (which owns the
U.K.’s Lovefilm), Google and Apple (via iTunes) will emerge as significant innovators
to challenge those traditional local players.

In the meantime, VOD remains stubbornly underdeveloped.

“Outside the U.K., it’s difficult to see where the value is in the VOD market,” says
Andrew Orr of Independent Film Sales. Sales agents who have experimented with
offering unsold or library titles directly to pan-European Web-based platforms such
as Mubi say that the returns so far have been negligible. “For social reasons,
European audiences are just not as advanced as Americans in terms of looking at
films on the Internet,” says Bankside’s Stephen Kelliher.

“VOD is still in its infancy in Scandinavia,” says Jim Frazee, acquisitions topper at
Scandinavian distrib Scanbox. “It’s doing business, but not growing as rapidly as we
hoped, and not nearly enough to compensate for DVD which is declining far more
rapidly than we feared. VOD needs to be 10 times larger than it is to make up for
DVD.”

Robert Beaumont of L.A.-based Lightning Entertainment sees a role for U.S. sales
agents and distributors in helping to develop the foreign VOD market by exporting
their domestic expertise.

“We’re a technical aggregator for cable systems in the U.S., and we have so much
experience about best practice, that we are contemplating offering this service in
Europe, to act as a go-between between distributors and VOD platforms,” he says.
“We would continue to sell rights as a sales agent, but because the VOD market in
Europe is immature, we could also service the ambitions of our European buyers by
providing technical support, not just for our content but for other sales companies as
well.”

By ADAM DAWTREY Mon., May. 7, 2012. Cannes Preview 2012